1 2025:CGHC:8520 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 169 of 2025 1 Polybond Rock Fibre Pvt. Ltd. A Company Duly Registered Under Relevant Provisions Of The Companies Act 1956, Having Its Registered Office At Chitlangia Compund Basantpur Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh Through Its Authorized Signatory/coordinator Shri Hira Swami Naidu, S/o Late Narayan Swami Naidu Aged About 64 Years R/o Dipak Nagar Near Nirankari Satsangh Bhawan, Durg, Chhattisgarh (Petitioner) 2 Hira Swami Naidu S/o Late Narayan Swami Naidu Aged About 64 Years Authorized Signatory/ Coordinator R/o Dipak Nagar, Polybond Rock Fibre, Pvt. Ltd. Rajnandgaon And Resident Of Near Nirankari Satsangh Bhawan Durg Chhattisgarh Civil And Revenue District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited (Cspdcl) A Company Incorporated Under The Relevant Provisions Of The Companies Act, 1956 And A Power Sector Undertaking Of The State Government Of Chhattisgarh And A Successor Of Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board C.S.E.B. Having Its Registered Office At 4 Floor, Vidyut Sewa Bhawan, Daganiya Raipur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent) 2 Chhattisgarh State Electricity Regulatory Commission C.S.E.R.C. A Body Corporate Constituted Under Section 82 Of The Electricity Act, 2003 Having Its Head Office At G.E. Road, Civil Lines, Raipur Chhattisgarh JYOTI SHARMA Digitally signed by JYOTI SHARMA Date: 2025.02.20 10:24:02 +0530 2 3 State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Energy, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 Bank Of India Through Its Branch Manager, Rajnandgaon Branch Fawwara Chowk, Digvijay College Road, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri Mayur Khandelwal, P.L. For Respondent No. 4 : Shri Anand Shukla, Advocate Hon'ble Justice Shri Bibhu Datta Guru Order on Board 19/02/2025 1. This MCC has been filed for restoration of WPC No. 2752 of 2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by this Court vide order dated 20.12.2024. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the above matter was listed on 20.12.2024 but due to some inadvertent mistake, he could not appear before this Court and the case was dismissed for want of prosecution. 3. On due consideration, the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner and the pleadings made in the MCC, the same is allowed. WPC NO. 2752 of 2016 is restored to its original number, subject of payment of cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the High Court Legal Aid Committee. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Jyoti