APHC010488782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 27125/2025 Between: 1. BALAGAM YEDUKONDALU, S/O.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 65-YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O. 30-248, NEAR RARNJI HIGH SCHOOL, BALAGAM VARI STREET, IVFACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRATERIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, O/O. DGP, MANGALAGIRI GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, O/O. COLLECTORATE, CHILKALAPUDI, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, O/O. SP, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. BALAGAM SIVA KUMAR, S/O.RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 42-YEARS, BUSINESS R/O. 30-248, NEAR RARNJI HIGH SCHOOL, BALAGAM VARI STREET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. BALAGAM SUNEETHA, W/O. BALAGAM SIVA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35-YEARS, BUSINESS, R/O. 30-248, NEAR RARNJI HIGH SCHOOL, BALAGAM VARI STREET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. KARANI POTHURAJU, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40- YRS, BUSINESS, R/O. 30-157, NEAR RAMJI HIGH SCHOOL, BALAGAM VARI STREET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. KARANI NAGA RAJU, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 35- YRS, BUSINESS, R/O. 30-157, NEAR RAMJI HIGH SCHOOL, BALAGAM YAH STREET, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K.RAJGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to Issue an order or orders or direction or an appropriate writ more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly Respondent Nos.5 and 6 direct them to vacate petitioner schedule and pass such.” 2. Heard Sri Kumpati Rajguru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home brought to the notice of this Court that the prayer in the present petition is against the private individual seeking eviction of the property and therefore, the Writ Petition is not maintainable. 4. In that view, as rightly pointed out by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.10.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.27125 of 2025 Dt.07.10.2025 Asr