Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5460 (PNJ)

SUMAN BHOLA v. VIJAY KUMAR SHARMA

COCP/1009/2026 · 2026-03-09

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1009 IN THE HI 109 Suman Bhol Sh. Vijay Ku CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW and others 04.12.2025 p 2. grant of stay not permittin 3. attention of submitted by has been du Chief Warde petition is ill 09-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Bhola Versus jay Kumar Sharma, Registrar M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Ram Pal Verma, Advocate Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 23.01.2026 (Annex CWP-1361.2026, titled as ‘Suman thers’ whereby the order of dismi 2025 passed by the respondent had bee Learned counsel for the petitio stay on the order of dismissal of th rmitting the petitioner to join the servi Learned counsel appearing for on of this Court to joining report date tted by the petitioner on which Dairy en duly endorsed; and copy of the sa Warden (Boys) Hostel. It is, therefor n is ill-founded, misplaced and not ma ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1009-2026 Date of Decision: 09.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ocate for the petitioner. ate for the respondent. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Suman Bhola vs. State of Haryana dismissal of the petitioner dated been stayed. petitioner submits that despite the l of the petitioner, the respondent is e service. g for the respondent has drawn the rt dated 27.01.2026 (Annexure P-2) Dairy No. 1079 dated 27.01.2026 the same has also been sent to the herefore, submitted that the present not maintainable. ging Writ ated the nt is the 2) 026 sent RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-1009 4. aforesaid sub 5. 6. dismissed. 7. 8. 09.03.2026 rishu 09-2026 -2- Learned counsel for the petitio aid submissions of learned counsel for Heard. In view of the facts noted ssed. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable petitioner is unable to dispute the sel for the respondent. above, the present petition is any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No the n is RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.09 18:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.