IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4807 of 2025 Date of Decision: 03.04.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Som Dutt ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Gupta and Mr. Abhyendra Gupta, Advocates. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. B.C Verma & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing the petitioner, on instructions, states that petitioner would be content and satisfied in case he is permitted to file representation for redressal of his grievance with further direction to the respondents to consider and decide the same in light of judgment dated 22.02.2022, passed by Three-Judge Bench of this Court in CWP No.2711 of 2017 titled as Baldev Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. 2. While putting in appearance on behalf of respondents, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that he is not averse to aforesaid innocuous prayer made on behalf of the petitioner and fairly states that representation, if any, filed by the