APHC010379512016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15245/2016 Between: 1. JAMI UMAMAHESWARA RAO, S/O.SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, VEERAVALLI, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS COMPETENT AUTHORITY (LAND ACQUISITION) & REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. VIJAYAWADA GUNDUGOLANU ROAD PROJECT PVT LTD, REP.BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, C/O.O/O. SUB- COLLECTOR, NUZVID, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BAPULAPADU MANDAL, BAPULAPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue the Writ order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to demolish the structures of the petitioner's house bearing D.No.8-97 in RS No.334/18A2 of Veeravalli Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, Krishna District beyond the extent of land acquired for formation of Bypass Road on NH No.5 as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and violative of provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 and consequently direct the respondents to follow the due procedure for demolition of structures pursuant to the notice dated 18-02-2016 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 18906 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents not to demolish the structures in the premises bearing D.No.8-97 of Veeravalli Village, Bapulapadu Mandal, 2 Krishna District without determining the extent of land acquired by the VI respondent for formation of bypass road pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP 22263 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased permit the petitioner to amend the cause title of the lst respondent as the National High Ways Authority of India rep.by its Project Director, Vijayawada, Krishna District instead of The National Highways Authority of India, ep.by its Competent Authority (Land Acquisition) & Revenue Divisional Officer, 4uzvid, Krishna District in W.P.No.15245 of 2016 and W.P.MP No.18906 of 2016 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 6th October, 2025 cbn 4 728 THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WP No.15245 of 2016 6th October, 2025 cbn