Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54591 (KAR)

SRI B M VENKATA REDDY v. SRI RIYAZ AHMED

CRP/197/2021 · 2025-11-04

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44737 CRP No. 197 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 197 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.M. VENKATA REDDY S/O LATE B.A. MUNISHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS RESIDING AT MELURU VILLAGE SIDDALGHATTA TLAUK CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI B.M. RAMACHANDRA REDDY S/O LATE B.A. MUNISHAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS RESIDING AT BANNIKUPPA VILLAGE NANDHI HOBLI, CHIKKABALLAPUR TALUK AND DISTRICT. 3. SRI. ESHWAR SWAROOP S/O SRI. C MUNIKRISHNA AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1, MATHRUSHREE NILAYA, 7TH CROSS, CIL LAYOUT CHOLANAYAKANAHALLI, R T NAGAR BENGALURU - 560 032. 4. SRI. C.S SURYAKANTH RAO S/O LATE SRI SRINIVAS RAO AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.102 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44737 CRP No. 197 of 2021 7TH CROSS, WILLIAMS TOWN EXTENSION, BENSON TOWN BENGALURU - 560 046. 5. SRI. R RAVINDRA RAO S/O SRI G. RATNOJI RAO AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT NO.120, MACCAN ROAD, SHIVAJINAGAR BENGALURU - 560 001. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. JANARDHANA REDDY B.J, ADVOCATE) AND: SRI. RIYAZ AHMED S/O SRI. ABDUL JABBAR AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.39, 2ND FLOOR, SIRSI ROD, 6TH CROSS, CHARMARAJPET, BENGALURU - 560 018. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. FAZIL AHMED, ADVOCATE) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.06.2021 PASSED ON IA-II IN OS.No.7266/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE LXI ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, REJECTING THE IA No.II FILED UNDER ORDER VII RULE 11(d) OF CPC FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:44737 CRP No. 197 of 2021 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned Advocate for the petitioner is hereby withdraw the case as not pressed, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, revision petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50