Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5458 (MAD)

Arumugam v. Subramaniyan

AS(MD)/66/2025 · 2026-03-10

P Vadamalai

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 10.03.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2406 of 2025 Arumugam .. Appellant Vs. 1.Subramaniyan 2.Sivagurunathan 3.Vasantha @ Vasanthalakshmi 4.Nagalakshmi 5.Prakash 6.Saravanan 7.Mohan 8.Uthayakumar 9.Kalaivani 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 Vanaja (Died) 10.Sumathi 11.Sundaresan 12.Mythili @ Krishnaveni 13.Senthilkumar 14.Devi .. Respondents Prayer : Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code to allow the present appeal suit and consequently set aside the decree and judgment dated 28.08.2024 made in O.S.No.100 of 2018 passed by the learned Additional District Judge (Fast Track Court), Kumbakonam in ordering the relief as sought for in the suit forthwith. For Appellant : No Appearance For R4 to R14 : Mr.G.Gomathi Shankar, Advocate R1 to R3 : Died JUDGMENT Today, this matter has been listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 14 is present, and there is no representation for the 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 appellant. Even on the earlier occasion i.e. on 06.03.2026, there was no representation for the appellant. 3. Being left with no other option, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 10.03.2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking Order :Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No mkn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 P. VADAMALAI , J. mkn To The Additional District Court (Fast Track Court), Kumbakonam. A.S.(MD)No.66 of 2025 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2406 of 2025 10.03.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis