Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 340/2013 in SWP No. 2354/2012
Munesh Kumar …. Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
V/s
Sunder Singh, Z.E.O Bhaderwah, Doda. ….Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG.
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
17.02.2025.
The instant contempt petition has been preferred against order/judgment passed by this Court dated 18.10.2012.
The instant contempt petition has come up before this Court after nine years and no effort has been made on behalf of the petitioner to get this contempt petition listed.
However, Mr. Vishal Bharti, learned Dy. AG submits that order stands complied with and the detailed statement of facts has already been placed on record.
This is precisely the reason that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and no fruitful purpose will be served to keep this contempt petition alive.
Accordingly, the instant contempt petition stands closed.
Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu:
17.02.2025. Neha-1
Sr.No. 44 Neha Kumari 2025.02.18 20:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document