Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5458 (CHH)

RAM KUMAR AANDIL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/584/2022 · 2025-08-27

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:43772 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 584 of 2022 * - Ram Kumar Aandil S/o Shri Basant Lal Aandil Aged About 38 Years Data Entry Operator Office Of Chief Medical Officer Baikunthpur Koriya, District Koriya Chhattisgarh, R/o Bhaisa Dafai, Haldibadi Chirimiri Haldibadi Koriya , District Koriya Chhattisgarh Pin 497451 ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya , New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh Pin 492001. 2 - District Collector Koriya, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh Pin 497559. 3 - Chief Medical Officer Baikunthpur, District Hospital Koriya, District Koriya Chhattisgarh Pin 497335 4 - District Programm Manager, National Health Mission Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh Pin 497335 5 - Director Mission Sanchalak National Health Mission Raipur Third Floor Chhattisgarh Grih Nirmar Mandal Vyavsayik Parisar, Sector 27, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 492001. ... Respondents For Petitioner : None appeared even in two rounds For Respondents/State : Mr. Vedant Shadangi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 28/08/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- 10.1 Hold that the action of the part of the respondent authorities is patently illegal and arbitrary beside being capricious and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to produce entire record pertaining to the petitioner's case. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2025.08.30 11:21:01 +0530 2 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 03/12/2021 Annexure P/7 passed by the respondent no. R/4 District Program Officer. 10.4 This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to produce entire record pertaining to the petitioner's case. 10.5 Any other relief in the discretion of this Hon'ble Court. 10.6 Cost of the petition. 2. The petitioner was working as Data Entry Operator on contract basis under respondent No. 4 from year 2013. A show cause notice was issued to the petitioner vide Annexure P-7 dated 03.12.2021 by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioner was found negligent in discharge of his duties and last opportunity was afforded to the petitioner. The petitioner filed reply to said notice on 23.08.2021. The petitioner has challenged the show cause notice dated 03.12.2021. 3. Perusal of the record would show that no interim order has been passed in favour of the petitioner. Show cause notice was issued way back in the year 2021 and reply was filed. If the employer has not taken any decision with regard to show cause notice dated 03.12.2021, it is directed that a prompt decision be taken by respondent No.3. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti