MANJUNATH K M v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY CHITS
WP/2410/2019 · 2025-07-22
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54576 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27766 WP No. 2410 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 2410 OF 2019 (GM-CFA) BETWEEN:
MANJUNATH K M S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/O NO.95/1, 1ST CROSS 20TH MAIN, MARENAHALLI VIJAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560 040
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH K.M., PARTY-IN-PERSON, ABSENT)
AND:
1.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY CHITS NORTH ZONE MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 003
2.
RAGHU K N S/O NAGAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS C/O NAGARAJ T B R/O NO.697, 2ND FLOOR C/O NAGARAJ T B SHIVAKRIPA, OPP RAVI GYM NAGARABAVI 2ND STAGE BENGALURU-560 072
3.
GIRIVAJRA CHITS PRIVATE LIMITED SOUKYA APARTMENT NO.386, SAMPIGE ROAD MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU-560 03
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27766 WP No. 2410 of 2019
BY ITS MANAGER
4.
GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC CHANNASANDRA KADUGODI POST BENGALURU-560 067 BY ITS PRINCIPAL
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. SRINIVAS KUMAR., HCGP FOR R1 & R4;
SRI. G.S. PRASANNA KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 01.01.2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-C PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE XI ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU IN EX.NO. 770/2015 AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 22.07.2025 seeking permission to retire from the matter along with the said memo a notice issued by learned counsel for the petitioner to the petitioner, the Registered Post Receipt and Register Post Acknowledgement Cover has been enclosed.
2. A perusal of returned cover indicates that the notice could not be served on account of “insufficient address”.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27766 WP No. 2410 of 2019
no further address of the petitioner available with the counsel for the petitioner.
3. In that view of the matter, the memo of retirement is accepted. Sri.Devi Prasad Shetty., learned counsel is permitted to retire from the matter, he is discharged from the matter.
4. Since, the notice issued by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the petitioner has returned with the endorsement “insufficient address”. There would be no purpose by this Court of issuing a fresh notice to the very same address. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
SR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5