KODE NAGA VENKATA RAMANA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/9213/2024 · 2025-11-21
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54575 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54575 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010181762024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9213/2024 Between:
KODE NAGA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. SITHA RAMAIAH, AGE 28 YEARS, OCC-STUDENT, 6-436, CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHALLAPALLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V.RAVINDHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... writ of Mandamus directing the respondent-2 not registering the FIR basing on the complaint submitted by the petition on dated 23- 12-2023 at 11-11 A.M and the same as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violation of article 14 and 21 of constitution of India and against to the principles of natural justice and consequentially direct the respondent-2 to register the FIR basing on the complaint submitted by the petitioner on dated 23-12-2023 in the interest of justice.”
2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the contents of the complaint would show that the matter is
2
relating to cyber crime, as such, the Police have not registered any case based on the said complaint.
3. Sri V.Ravindhar, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before the Cyber Crime Police in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:22.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.9213 of 2024
Dt.22.11.2025
Dinesh