Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35472 WP No. 17501 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 17501 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
MR. SHASHIKUMAR AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, S/O NARAYANASWAMY, CONVICT PRISON, BENGALURU.
PERMANENT RESIDENT OF UGANAVADI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU 562110.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. THEJAS, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. LAKSHMIKANTH G.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDL.CHIEF SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIKASA SOUDHA,
Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35472 WP No. 17501 of 2025
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE- 560001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF PRISONS NO.4, SESHADRI ROAD, BANGALORE- 560 009.
3.
THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PARAPPANA AGRAHARA, ELECTRONIC CITY, BANGALORE 560 100.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.K.P. YASHODHA., AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT NO. CPB/CTP-SEC/20123/2025 DATED 10.02.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER ON GENERAL PAROLE FOR A PERIOD OF 30 DAYS.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35472 WP No. 17501 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is sentenced for rigorous life imprisonment in Special Case No. 220 of 2016, and the petitioner’s application is rejected by the third respondent with the impugned Endorsement dated 10.02.2025 essentially on the ground that the petitioner is admitted to parole in the recent past. Sri Thejas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner was granted parole on 05.08.2024 for 30 days and he has returned to prison without any reason for complaint and that as such the petitioner's application which is beyond six months from the date of return could not have been rejected on such ground.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35472 WP No. 17501 of 2025
This Court must observe that in terms of the Karnataka Prisons and Correctional Services Manual - 2021 [for short, the 'Manual'], the second respondent will have to consider the request in the light of the purpose for which parole is requested taking note of all facts and circumstances. Hence the following:
ORDER
[A] The petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a request for general parole through his counsel with the third respondent on email [cpblr.prisons- kar@gov.in] calling upon the third respondent to forward the report on whether the petitioner must be admitted to general parole to the second respondent within fifteen [15] days from the date of receipt of the application.
- 5 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35472 WP No. 17501 of 2025
[B] The second respondent is called upon to consider the same and communicate the decision within four [4] weeks from the date of receipt of such report.
Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
NV