Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54571 (AP)

THORATI SUBBA RAO v. SRI K J PRAKASH BABU

CC/1287/2025 · 2025-11-04

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010247542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA CONTEMPT CASE Between: 1. THORATI SUBBA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O 8 VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT. 1. SRI K J PRAKASH BABU, THE MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT WP) 2. SRI T V S SURYANARAYANA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT 3. SRI MALLIVEDU VENKATA REDDY, THE CHOPPELLA GRAM PANACHAYATI, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, CHOPPELLA, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT WP). 4. MERLA SRINU, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O CHOPPELLA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SIMHADRI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1287/2025 THORATI SUBBA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, R/O 8-55, POST OFFICE VEEDHI, CHOPPELLA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA ...PETITIONER AND SRI K J PRAKASH BABU, THE TASHISLADAR, ALAMUR REVENUE MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT SRI T V S SURYANARAYANA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT-(R-5 IN WP). U VENKATA REDDY, THE CHOPPELLA GRAM PANACHAYATI, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, CHOPPELLA, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT MERLA SRINU, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O CHOPPELLA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT-(R-7 IN WP) ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3328] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA THORATI SUBBA RAO, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, 55, POST OFFICE VEEDHI, CHOPPELLA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA ...PETITIONER TASHISLADAR, ALAMUR REVENUE MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT-(R-4 IN SRI T V S SURYANARAYANA RAO, THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, DR. U VENKATA REDDY, THE CHOPPELLA GRAM PANACHAYATI, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, CHOPPELLA, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR KONA SEEMA DISTRICT-(R- 6 IN MERLA SRINU, S/O KOTAIAH, AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, R/O CHOPPELLA VILLAGE, ALAMURU MANDAL, DR. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. BOLLA VENKATA RAMA RAO 2. Y KOTESWARA RAO 3. Y BALAJI The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri G. Simhadri, learned Counsel for the Contempt Petitioner, Sri Abdul Rasheed, learned Counsel representing Sri Y. Balaji, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 & 2, Sri Y. Koteswara Rao, learned Counsel for Respondent No.3. 2. Sri Abdul Rasheed, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Respondent Nos.1 & 2 has drawn the attention of this Court to the contents of the Counter-Affidavit. Copy of it is served on the Counsel for the Petitioner. 3. The Counter-Affidavit along with the accompanying documents would indicate that the Official Respondents have put up a Board cautioning the Unofficial Respondents not to undertake any construction in view of the Status quo Order. The Report of the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat, dated 09.05.2025, would indicate that the Petitioner is not engaged in any agricultural activity and on the contrary, is operating a brick kiln on the said land. 4. Having regard to these facts, this Court is satisfied that the Status quo Order of this Court dated 02.04.2025, is maintained by the Respondents. Hence, there is no violation of the Court’s Order, much less wilfully. 5. In this view of the matter, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 05.11.2025 DSV 142 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1287/2025 05.11.2025 DSV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No. CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1287/2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No DATE ORDER Office Note 03. 05.11.2025 GRKP, J Contempt Case is closed. (vide separate order) ___________ GRKP, J DSV