IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1390 of 2025 ------ Md. Nanka Ansari, aged about 32 years, S/o Manjur Ansari, Residing at C/o. Manjur Ansari, Village –Choura, P.O. – Choura, P.S. –Tiruldih, District –Saraikela-Kharsawan, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vineet Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Manmohit Bhalla, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 03.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Tiruldih P.S. Case No. 26 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that; the father of the petitioner committed cheating and criminal breach of trust and the petitioner criminally intimidated the victim. It is then submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-19 of the instant anticipatory bail application. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the mother of the informant namely Kuresha Khatoon died on 16.04.2017 leaving behind the informant and she was looked after by the father of the petitioner- who is the maternal uncle of the informant and the minor victim girl was kidnapped from the house of the father of the petitioner by one Md. Shaidul with the aid of others and there is no allegation against the petitioner of cheating or committing criminal breach of trust. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready to co-operate with the investigation of the case and he undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person has already been given the privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 14.01.2025, in A.B.A. No. 8039 of 2024. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be also given the privilege of anticipatory bail. The learned Addl. PP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Chandil in connection with Tiruldih P.S. Case No. 26 of 2022 subject to the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during pendency of the case and will co-operate with the Investigation of the case and will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will submit mobile number and photocopy of Aadhaar card at the time of surrender in the court below with an undertaking not to change mobile phone number during the pendency of the case along with the other conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of BNSS, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-