Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54569 (AP)

AMBATI KOTI REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5696/2025 · 2025-04-30

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

I 6 . ^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATt^^ (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5696 OF 2025 Between: Ambati Koti Reddy Operator,P.R. 14004, Vehicle No. AP 39 TO 8832,Vemula Village, Mundlamur Mandal, Prakasam District, A.P. S/o Narayana Reddy, 28 years, MDU ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies, Secretariat at Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Collector and District Magistrate, Prakasam District, Ongole, A.P. 3. The Collector(CS), Prakasam District, Ongole, A.P. 4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ongole, A.P. 5. The Tahsildar, Mundlamur Mandal, Prakasam Districts. 6. The Food Inspector, Podili, Prakasam District, A.P. 7. The Village Revenue Officer, Kammavaripalem, Mundlamur Mandal, Prakasam District, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, to declaring the action of respondent-Food Inspector, Podili, Prakasam District, A.P. who seized MDU Vehicle No. AP39TQ8832 of petitioner as illegal and consequently set-aside the proceedings RC.CS1/6A/160/2025, dt.4-2-2025, who passed illegal orders and opposed 3rd of respondent-Collector(CS), Ongole in % to the spirit of Judgements of this Honble Court, and also mandatory provisions of Control Orders and also violate of principals of natural justice and without jurisdiction and set- aside the proceedings of 3'"^ respondent/collector (CS), Ongole, dt.4-2-2025 in Rc.CSI/6A/160/2025 and consequently to direct the respondents to release the MDU Vehicle No. AP39TQ8832 to the petitioner. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the petitioner's MDU Vehile bearing No;AP39TQ8832, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ALAPATI VIVEKANANDA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 7: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER ¥ APHC010110232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 050 [3459] "A 0?^ THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 5696/2025 Between: Ambati Koti Reddy ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT{S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Alapati Vivekananda Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following ORDER: The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “...to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, to declaring the action of 6th respondent-Food Inspector, Podili, Prakasam District, A.P. Who seized MDU Vehicle No. AP39TQ8832 of petitioner as illegal and consequently set-aside the proceedings of 3rd respondent-Collector(CS), Ongole in Rc.CSI/6A/160/2025, dt.4-2-2025, who passed illegal orders and opposed to the Judgements of this Honble Court, and alsospiret of mandatory provisions of Control Orders and also violate of principals of natural justice and without Jurisdiction and set- aside the Ongole, dt.4-2-2025 in proceedings of 3rd respondent/Collector (CS) RC.CSI/6A/160/2025 and the MDU Vehicle No. order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. consequently to direct the respondents to release AP39TQ8832 to the petitioner and pass such other filed counter affidavit, stating that the vehicle of Respondent No,3 has the MDU was handed over to the petitioner on 01.04.2025. 2. In view of the same, no further orders are required in this Writ Petition. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to 4. costs. miscellaneous pending petitions, if any, shall stand closed. As a sequel Sd/- Wl. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT SECTI^ OFFICER AR //TRUE COPY// To, one CC to Sri Alapati Vivekananda, Advocate [OPUCl High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 1 2. Two CCS to GP for Civil Supplies 3. Three CD Copies. ssb HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.5696 of 2025 CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS