DR. VINAY GUPTA v. PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED
LPA/1341/2024 · 2025-09-10
Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54566 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54566 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 105+213 LPA-1341-2024 (O&M) Date of Decision: 10.09.2025 DR. VINAY GUPTA ...Appellant Versus PUNJAB STATE POWER CORPORATION LIMITED AND ANR ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Puneet Sharma, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Ranjit Singh Kalra, Advocate with Ms. Mona Yadav, Advocate, for PSPCL. ***** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that though the entitlement of the respondent to recover the amount as held by the learned Single Judge is not being disputed on the part of the appellant herein, but the grievance is that the calculation done by the respondents was not correct keeping in view the fact that 40% amount of total claimed by the respondents has already been deposited by the appellant.
2.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant will be satisfied at this stage in case the aforesaid grievance regarding the calculation is decided by the respondents by passing an appropriate speaking
order.
HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
LPA-1341-2024 (O&M) (2)
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in case any representation is filed by the appellant showing that the calculation done with regard the amount demanded by the respondents is incorrect, the same will be looked into and the said representation will be decided within a period of eight weeks by passing an appropriate speaking order. In case it is found that the claim of the appellant is meritorious, the same will be accepted, otherwise due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the appellant for his information and necessary action.
4.
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in view of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondents, the present appeal be disposed of as not pressed with liberty as prayed for.
5. Ordered accordingly.
6. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI ) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) September 10, 2025 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable No HARISH KUMAR 2025.09.11 18:49 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment