APHC010076292019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 3396/2019 Between: 1. BNR CONSTRUCTIONS, B.N.R. CONSTRUCTIONS, REP.BY ITS PARTNER, B.YERRISWAMY REDDY, S/O. B.LAKSHMANNA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O. DOOR NO.12/4/70, 80' ROAD, VIDYUT NAGAR, ANANTAPUR, ANANATPUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTPUR DISTRICT, ANANTPUR. 4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTPUR DISTRICT, ANANTPUR. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN POLICE STATION, ANANTPUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.3396 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “….to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in summoning the petitioner to the police station and interfering with civil disputes in relation to the land admeasuring to an extent of Ac.7-65 cents situated in T.S.Nos.2012, 2143 and 2677, Anantapur Town as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the property by the petitioner and pass……” 2. It is submitted that Sri Sai Saran Chodisetty, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.Sri Ram, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the lis does not survive as on the day, as police completed investigation and laid charge sheet before the concerned Magistrate, and later, a Criminal Petition was also filed in this Court for quash of the proceedings. 3. In that view of the matter, no further orders are required in the writ petition at this length of time. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 5. The submissions of the learned counsel for the writ petitioner are recorded. 3 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed at the stage of admission, without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 28.10.2025 Pmk 4 37 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:3396 OF 2019 Date: 28.10.2025 Pmk