Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54560 (AP)

P CHINNA GARJAPPA v. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS

CC/2067/2024 · 2025-11-13

R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010149132024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] FRIDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2067/2024 Between: 1. P CHINNA GARJAPPA, S/O. P LINGANNA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, AGRICULTURE, PEDDAHARIVANAM VILLAGE, ADONI MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI SHASHI BHUSHAN KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT G SRIJANA I A S, DISTRICT COLLECTOR (IRRIGATION WING), KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. SRI C NARAYANA REDDY, , ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, MINOR/MAJOR IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION BHAVAN, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SRI REDDY SEKHAR REDDY, SUPERINTENDENT OF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI REDDY SEKHAR REDDY, , INCHARGE, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, M.L.(WEST) DIVISION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 6. SRI N GULZAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent, for willful, deliberate disobeying of the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court dated 12.09.2022 in W.P.No.25910 of 2022, under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 28 days in filing the above contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of this Court in W.P.No.25910 are complied with. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this Contempt Case is accordingly, closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 14.11.2025 KA 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2067/2024 Date: 14.11.2025 KA