APHC010046382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO: 272/2025 Between: 1. KUDUMULA SEENAMMA, W/O CHINNA VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 6763/5, BADVEL TOWN, VIDYANAGAR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. CHENNURU JAYALAKSHUMMA,, W/O AYYAVARA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 6-6-201-1, SIVA RAMA KRISHNA NAGAR, BADVEL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. G SAI PRASAD, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, LAND ACQUISITION SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 3. G SREENIVASULU, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, WORKING AS SPECIAL COLLECTOR (LA), GALERU NAGARI SUJALA SHAVANTI GNSS, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. K VENKATESH, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS. WORKING AS SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION TGP-II, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K KOUTILYA Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K M KRISHNA REDDY The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri K.M. Krishna Reddy, learned Counsel representing the Respondents has submitted Written Instruction from the Respondents that the Order of this Court has been complied with and therefore, the present Contempt Case does not survive any more. 2. This Court had directed Sri K. Koutilya, learned Counsel for the Petitioners to take instructions from his client as regards the compliance of the Order of this Court. 3. When this matter was called out after one (01) hour, Sri K. Koutilya, learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, submits that the Order of 3 this Court has been complied with and no further consideration of this Contempt Case is necessary. 4. Having recorded the same, this Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 07.04.2025 SCH 4 105 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CONTEMPT CASE NO.272 OF 2025 07.04.2025 SCH