Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54558 (BOM)

BABURAO S/O RAMCHANDRA PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR COMMISSIONER OF POLICE NAGPUR AND OTHERS.

WP/697/2025 · 2025-09-16

Shri Anil L Pansare, Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

911 wp 697-2025.doc 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.697/2025 Baburao s/o Ramchandra Patil Vs. State of Maharashtra, through Commissioner of Police Nagpur and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri R.L. Kadu, Advocate for petitioner Ms R.V. Sharma, APP for respondent Nos.1and 2 CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, JJ. DATE : 16.09.2025 1. On 04.09.2025, following order was passed: “1. Heard. 2. Perused the petition. The petitioner is seeking re-investigation in the matter when FIR itself is not lodged. The petitioner in the second prayer, however, has made a request seeking direction to lodge FIR against respondent Nos. 3 to 9. 3. In our view, the petitioner has alternative and efficacious remedy for redressal of his grievance under Section 175 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, more particularly, sub- section (3) thereof. 4. The petitioner’s counsel shall take instructions in the matter. 5. List in the week commencing from 15-9-2025.” 2. Learned Counsel for petitioner, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to 911 wp 697-2025.doc 2 take recourse to the remedy as is available in law. 3. Permission is granted. 4. The Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) (ANIL L. PANSARE, J.) R.S. Sahare