APHC010161832022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 10460/2022 Between: 1. AMUDALA NAGA BHUSHANAM, SON OF (LATE) VEERARAJU, HINDU, AGED 48 YEARS, DOOR NO.18-11-22, KHUDDUS NAGAR, KEDARESWARAPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. AMUDALA SUJATHA, W/O.AMUDALA NAGA BHUSHANAM, HINDU, AGED 37 YEARS, DOOR NO.18-11-22, KHUDDUS NAGAR, KEDARESWARAPETA, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE S.I.OF POLICE, V TOWN POLICE STATION, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJ AYAWADA. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, V TOWN POLICE STATION, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondents 2 and 3 in calling the Petitioners to their police station and threatening them to implicate in Criminal cases without there being any lawful complaint against the Petitioners is nothing but arbitrary, unreasonable, unlawful and against to the Fundamental Rights of the Petitioners under Article 21 of the Constitution of India by further consequently to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to call the Petitioners to their police station, except under due process of law, and pass such 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Grant Interim of Direction directing the Respondents 2 and 3 not to call the Petitioners to their police station, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the Petitioners seeking the following relief: “...... to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondents 2 and 3 in calling the Petitioners to their police station and threatening them to implicate in Criminal cases without there being any lawful complaint against the Petitioners is nothing but arbitrary, unreasonable, unlawful and against to the Fundamental Rights of the Petitioners under Article 21 of the Constitution of India by further consequently to direct the Respondents 2 and 3 not to call the Petitioners to their police station, except under due process of law, and pass such ...” At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State, on instructions would submit that basing on the complaint received in SPANDANA programme, Petitioners were called to the Police station and that respondent Police never interfered in the disputes of the Petitioners and unofficial respondents and would submit that necessary orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are directed to follow due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 10460 of 2022 04.11.2025 Mjl /*