Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54543 (KAR)

K.R. MANJULA v. THE COMMISSIONER

MSA/52/2025 · 2025-07-29

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29221 MSA No. 52 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO. 52 OF 2025 BETWEEN: K.R. MANJULA D/O. LATE. RANGACHAR.T.S. W/O. VENKATESH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 2ND CROSS, VINBONAGAR B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANJANEYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER, TUMAKURU CITY CORPORATION TUMAKURU - 572 101. 2. SHIVAKUMAR S/O. GURUSIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O. 2ND CROSS, VINOBNAGARA, B.H. ROAD, TUMAKURU - 572 101. …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 54(2) OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29221 MSA No. 52 of 2025 IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12.12.2024, PASSED IN MA.NO.8/2024, ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED IST ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, AT TUMAKURU, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Heard on I.A.Nos.3 and 4/2025. 2. The same are allowed in view of the memo being filed by the learned counsel for the appellant seeking to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings. 3. Memo reads as under: "I, the undersigned counsel for the Appellant by mistake & have filed above appeal. Hence, I am withdraw the above appeal, kindly liberty may be granted to file the fresh W.P (GM-CPC) in the interest of justice and equity." 4. Placing the memo filed by learned counsel for the appellant on record, this appeal is dismissed with liberty as prayed for. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29221 MSA No. 52 of 2025 5. Time spent in this appeal, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing the period of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Hence, following; O R D E R Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AMM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2