APHC010096952023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4866/2023 Between: 1. K PHANIBHUSHAN, S/O. SURYA PRAKASH RAO, AGED ABOUT 43, WORKING AS CONTRACTOR, R/O. ENGLISH PALEM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, GUDURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. LANKA SUBRAMANYAM, S/O. GNANA SUNDER RAO, CHITTIGUDURU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHITTIGUDURU VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KARISHNA DISTRICT DISTRICT. 5. LANKA CHENDRA LEELA, CHITTIGUDURU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, CHITTIAGUDURU VILLAGE, GUDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y ANUPAMA DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the part of the 2nd and 3rd respondents on the petitioner Complaint dated 2-1-2023, and 9-2-2023 and Non-Registered the Crime against the 4 and 5 respondents as arbitrary, illegal, abdication of the statutory duty cast on him and violate the fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14,19, and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to act on the complaint dated 2-1-2023, and 9-2-2023 submitted by the petitioner and take action against the respondents 4 and 5 and pass...” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 22.11.2025 ASR 180 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4866 of 2023 Dt.22.11.2025 ASR