SAU PUSHPABAI LAXMANRAO KATHANE v. SMT SULOCHANA BABAN CHAWAKE AND OTHERS
CAS/653/2025 · 2025-09-23
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54542 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54542 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
23. CAS 312.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO. 312 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.
NO. 18380 OF 2024
Sau. Chhabu Bhagwan Kathane Vs. Digambar Bapurao Chawke and anr. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO. 653 OF 2025 IN SECOND APPEAL ST.
NO. 18405 OF 2024
Sau. Pushpabai Laxmanrao Kathane Vs. Smt. Sulochana Baban Chawake & ors. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Court's or Judge's Order Coram, appearances, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's order Mr. S. C. Bhalerao, Advocate for applicant in both application. Mr. V. D. Darne, Advocate for non-applicant No. 2 in CAS No. 312/2025 and for respondent No. 1, 3 and 4 in CAS No. 653 of
2025.
CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.
DATE : 23.09.2025. . This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 89 days caused in filing the Second Appeal against judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024, passed in Regular Civil Appeal No. 9 of 2019. The delay is attributed to some medical reason. Documentary evidence in support of the same is filed alongwith application. The contents in the application are not denied by filing any counter.
3. In view of above, although the learned Advocate for the non-applicant No.2 opposes the application, delay of 89 days caused in filing the Second Appeal is hereby condoned. The civil application stands disposed of.
2
23. CAS 312.25.odt CIVIL APPLICATION (CAS) NO. 653 OF 2025 4 This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 86 days caused in filing the Second Appeal against judgment and decree dated 18.03.2024, passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.3 of 2019. The delay is attributed to some medical reason. Documentary evidence in support of the same is filed alongwith application. The contents in the application are not disputed by filing any counter.
5. In view of above, although the learned Advocate for the non-applicant Nos.1, 3 and 4 opposes the application, delay of 86 days caused in filing the second appeal is hereby condoned. The civil application stands disposed of.
(ROHIT W. JOSHI, J.) Tanmay