SATENDRA SINGH KASHYAP ALIAS SATYENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/739/2021 · 2025-03-11
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5454 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 5454 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.739 of 2021 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, B.H. for the State.
3. Learned counsel for the State made a statement at bar that the writ petition has rendered infructuous as charge sheet has already been submitted in the matter on 09.06.2021, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. In view of the statement so made by learned counsel for the State, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
11.03.2025 SK