COCP No.1922 of 202 IN TH 137 DHANATAR SIN Vs KK YADAV VIC CORAM: HON' Present: Mr. S for th Ms. S for re HARKESH MAN 1. Vaka 2. Lear contend that the disbursement ther 3. In vi counsel for the pe 4. Dism 5. How period, as per the contempt petition liable to pay a su the petitioners to listing of revival a January 17, 202 Atik Wheth Wheth 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De R SINGH AND ANOTHER VICE CHANCELLOR AND ANOT ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Surinder Gaur, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Shazia K. Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2. **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respo Learned counsel for respondent No t the claim raised on behalf of the p nt thereof shall be made within two w In view of the aforesaid undertakin the petitioners does not press the prese Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stand However, in case the needful is not er the undertaking, the petitioners wou etition and in that eventuality, the er y a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from towards litigation expenses, imm vival application. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.1922 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 17.01.2025 ......Petitioners ANOTHER ..Respondents ESH MANUJA f respondent No.2 is taken on record. nt No.2 relies upon letter (undated) f the petitioners has been accepted an two weeks from today. ertaking by the respondent(s), learne e present petition. stands discharged. is not done within the aforementione would be at liberty to seek revival o the erring/concerned officer would b s) from his/her own pocket in favour o s, immediately i.e. on the first date o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 cord. ated) to ted and learned ntioned vival of ould be avour of date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.18 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment