Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54536 (AP)

P.Surya Apparao, v. The Inspector of Police,

WP/13115/2021 · 2025-10-13

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010228022021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 13115/2021 Between: 1. P.SURYA APPA RAO, S/O.NARASAIAH, AGE 54 YEARS, D.NO.2-29, MAIN ROAD, KANAPARRU, NADENDLA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARUNDELPET P.S., GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR 3. THE STATE OF A P, REP. ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, AMARAVATI ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent interfering with life, 86 liberty of Petitioners' family without any cause of action as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Art. 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st Respondent and its sub-ordinates not to interfere with the life, and liberty of Petitioners' family without any notice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “....to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent interfering with life, 86 liberty of Petitioners' family without any cause of action as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and principles of natural justice and pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on instructions would submit that respondent Police never interfered in the life and liberty of the Petitioner or his family and never called him to the Police Station and that appropriate orders may be passed by disposing of this Writ Petition. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 13115 of 2021 14.10.2025 Mjl /*