IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 109 Manjinder Singh KAP Sinha, IAS, Chief others CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 31.1.2025 (Annexure P Court in CWP Punjab and others ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the respondents consider and decide the representation dated 31.12.2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously”. direction has not been complied with by the respondents. there is no time limit stipulated in the order dated 31.1.2025, however, COCP-2232-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.2232 of 2025 Date of decision : Manjinder Singh Versus KAP Sinha, IAS, Chief Secretary, Government of Punjab and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mandhir Singh Virk, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 31.1.2025 (Annexure P-3) passed by a co Court in CWP-2698-2025 titled as “Manjinder Singh vs. State of and others”. Vide order dated 31.1.2025 (Annexure P ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the respondents consider and decide the representation dated 31.12.2024, in accordance with law, expeditiously”. Learned counsel for the petit direction has not been complied with by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents there is no time limit stipulated in the order dated 31.1.2025, however, 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2232 of 2025 Date of decision :-08.05.2025 …..Pettitioner Secretary, Government of Punjab and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mandhir Singh Virk, Advocate Mr. Manmeet Singh Teji, AAG Punjab. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated ) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Manjinder Singh vs. State of Vide order dated 31.1.2025 (Annexure P-3) the co- ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the respondents “….to consider and decide the representation dated 31.12.2024, in Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the said direction has not been complied with by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents-State submits that there is no time limit stipulated in the order dated 31.1.2025, however, VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.09 14.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document it is submitted that if any representatio received in the office of the respondents, the same shall be looked into and disposed of expeditiously. State, the present petition is May 08, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-2232-2025 it is submitted that if any representatio received in the office of the respondents, the same shall be looked into and disposed of expeditiously. In view of the said statement of learned counsel for the State, the present petition is disposed of. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 it is submitted that if any representation on behalf of petitioner is received in the office of the respondents, the same shall be looked into In view of the said statement of learned counsel for the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.05.09 14.34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document