Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54526 (MAD)

D.PARKAVI v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WP/16258/2024 · 2025-08-11

M S Ramesh, V Lakshminarayanan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.16258 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 11.08.2025 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P.No.16258 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.23284, 31035 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.24100 of 2025 D.Parkavi ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Government of Puducherry, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, (Personnel Wing), Puducherry-605 001 2.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai-600 002 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order dated 09.02.2024 passed in O.A.No.126 of 2023 passed by the second respondent and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent to place the petitioner in wait list as per the marks secured by the petitioner and consider the petitioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16258 of 2024 for appointment in the event of filling up of vacancies from the wait list. For Petitioners : Mr.R.Rajesh Kumar For Respondents : Mr.R.Syed Mustafa Special Government Pleader (Pondy) for R1 ORDER M.S.RAMESH, J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Since the recruitment notification dated 28.11.2022 for the post of LDC/Store Keeper Grade-III prescribes an upper age limit of 32 years for candidates belonging to the UR category, the petitioner herein, having crossed 32 years, was unable to apply for the said post. When she approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chennai by filing O.A.No.126 of 2023, she was permitted to participate in the selection process. However, as the petitioner had secured lesser marks than the cut- off prescribed for the post, the Central Administrative Tribunal, through the impugned order, rejeected her plea. Hence, we find no reason to interfere with the impugned order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16258 of 2024 2.The Writ Petition stands dismissed accordingly. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [M.S.R, J.] [V.L.N, J.] 11.08.2025 Anu Index: Yes / No Neutral Citation Speaking / Non Speaking M.S.RAMESH, J. AND V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J. Anu https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.16258 of 2024 To. 1.The Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, Government of Puducherry, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, (Personnel Wing), Puducherry-605 001 2.The Registrar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Madras Bench, Chennai-600 002 W.P.No.16258 of 2024 and W.M.P.Nos.23284, 31035 of 2024 and W.M.P.No.24100 of 2025 11.08.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis