- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27520 WP No. 16100 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.16100 OF 2025 (IPR) BETWEEN: M/S UDUPI RUCHI, NO.793/1, 17TH MAIN, 59TH CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, RAJIJINAGAR, NEAR BHASHYAM CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 010. REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR MR. MADHU SUDHANA. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.GIRISHA.N.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SRI. FAMILY ENTERPRISES PVT LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, NO.1731-(31), 17TH CROSS, MC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. SR RAO SAHEB. 2. M/S SRI FAMILY BIZNET PVT. LTD., A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, NO.1731-(31), 17TH CROSS, MC LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. SR RAO SAHEB. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.MEDINI RAO., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27520 WP No. 16100 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED TODAY FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Girisha.N.R., counsel for the petitioner and Smt.Medini Rao., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the order dated 22.02.2025 passed by XVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-10) in O.S.No.4766/2017 on I.A.No.12 vide Annexure-A. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the arguments and perused the petition papers with care. 4. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel Smt.Medini Rao., submits that the plaintiff is not pressing the application I.A.No.12 that was filed under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27520 WP No. 16100 of 2025 The oral submission regarding non-pressing of the application is placed on record. When queried, counsel for the respondent submits that a conscious decision is taken. The oral submission made by counsel for the respondent is placed on record. 5. Because the plaintiff is not pressing the amendment application - I.A.No.12, the order passed by XVII Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-10) in O.S.No.4766/2017 on I.A.No.12 vide Annexure-A is set-aside. 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19