SRI. VARASIDDHI PADMA SADGURU BADESAHEB THATA DARGA COMMITTEE v. The State of Andhra Pradesh.
WP/11266/2022 · 2025-11-23
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54526 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54526 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010174492022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 11266/2022 Between:
1. SRI. VARASIDDHI PADMA SADGURU BADESAHEB THATA DARGA COMMITTEE, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. SMT. G. SUKANYA DEVI.
W/O. K.P,. KOCLANDA RAMI REDDY AGED 42 YEARS. OCE.
HOUSEWIFE. RIO. H.NO. 10/256. MALLARI STREET. YEMMILI-ANUR TOWN. KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT. VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH. AT AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, AT KURNOOL
4. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ADONI, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, YEMMIGANUR POLICE STATION, YCMMIGANUR MANDAL. KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the crime against G. Basha S/o. G. Badesab, (2) G. Badesab S/o. Late 0. Mastan Sal), and (3) G. Muhammad Rafiq S/o. G. Badesab, and their followers. for damaging four sign boards (lighting hoards) installed in the premises of the Sri Sri Varasiddhi Palma Sakunt Badesaheb Thaw Daraa, at Yemmiganur Town and Man l.al, Kurnool District, and .thereby causing loss of Rs. 1.20.000/- to the petitioner-Society, as highly illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice, and consequently praying this 1401117)1c Court to direct the respondents to register the FIR against the ( ) G. Basha Sio. G. Badesab. (2) G. Badesah S/o. Late G. Mastan Sat), and (3) G. Mohammad Rafiq S/o.G.Badesab, and their followers for damatzing the property of petitioner- Society. and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B V APARNA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief:
“ ... to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the crime against G. Basha S/o. G. Badesab, (2) G. Badesab S/o. Late G. Mastan Saheb, and (3) G. Muhammad Rafiq S/o. G. Badesab, and their followers for damaging four sign boards (lighting hoards) installed in the premises of the Sri Sri Varasiddhi Palma Sakunt Badesaheb Thaw Daraa, at Yemmiganur Town and Man l.al, Kurnool District, and .thereby causing loss of Rs.1.20.000/- to the petitioner- Society, as highly illegal. arbitrary, unconstitutional and against the principles of natural justice, and consequently praying this Hon’ble Court to direct the respondents to register the FIR against the (1) G. Basha S/o.G.Badesab. (2) G.Badesah S/o. Late G. Mastan Saheb and (3) G. Mohammad Rafiq S/o. G. Badesab, and their followers for damaging the property of petitioner- Society and to pass ...”
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that basing on the complaint of the Petitioner, a case in Crime No.167 of 2022 of Yemmiganur Urban Police Station and the case is under investigation and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders.
Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh