134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Jarnail Singh and another State of Punjab and others CORAM:- Present: DEEPAK SIBAL 1. he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Collector Development and Panchayat Mohali decision on the representation dated 02.08.2024 (Annexure P the petitioners. 2. above prayer is accepted. 3. of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jarnail Singh and another Versus State of Punjab and others - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr.Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl.A.G., Punjab. DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to Collector-cum-Divisional Deputy Director, Rural Development and Panchayat Mohali (Punjab) decision on the representation dated 02.08.2024 (Annexure P the petitioners. Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioners’ prayer is accepted. Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation (Annexure P-7) made by the petitioners, by passing speaking order(s) and IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-12874-2025 Date of Decision:- 06.05.2025 ...Petitioners Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI Mr.Amit Kumar Goyal, Addl.A.G., Punjab. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a ional Deputy Director, Rural (Punjab) - respondent No.3 to take a decision on the representation dated 02.08.2024 (Annexure P-7) made by Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioners’ Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation ers, by passing speaking order(s) and 2025 06.05.2025 s Respondents Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, he would be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with a ional Deputy Director, Rural respondent No.3 to take a 7) made by Learned State counsel has no objection if the petitioners’ Accordingly, at this stage, without commenting on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to take a decision on the aforesaid representation ers, by passing speaking order(s) and SUDHIR KUMAR 2025.05.09 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-12874-2025 [2] affording opportunity of hearing to all concerned within three month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Needless to add that the decision so taken be communicated to the petitioners and if the same is not to the satisfaction of the petitioners, they would be at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE 06.05.2025 (LAPITA BANERJI) sd JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SUDHIR KUMAR 2025.05.09 13:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document