101 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Rajesh Kumar a State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present: Mr. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The petition has been filed to 4 to protect the members, as they apprehend threat from respondents no.6 to 9 and their other associates. 2. Learned State 25.02.2025 under Section 336(4) of Act, 2000 was registered at Police Station City Rampura, Bathinda petitioner and Maninderjit Singh dated 03.03.2025 was prepared and filed before the Magistrate, Phul recorded his statement before the Court that he is the FIR. Learned State counsel 20.05.2025, to contend that as of now no threat to the petitioner or his family members’ life and liberty has been found. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4610-2025 Date of Decision :22.05.2025 alias Raju Jethi Versus of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (ORAL) The petition has been filed seeking directions to respondents no.1 to 4 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner as well as his family as they apprehend threat from respondents no.6 to 9 and their other Learned State counsel contends that 25.02.2025 under Section 336(4) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66(D) of the IT registered at Police Station City Rampura, Bathinda petitioner and Maninderjit Singh Sidhu. After investigation, cancellation report dated 03.03.2025 was prepared and filed before the Magistrate, Phul, on 04.03.2025. The complainant Resham Singh has also recorded his statement before the Court that he is Learned State counsel has also referred to status report, dated to contend that as of now no threat to the petitioner or his family life and liberty has been found. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 2025 Date of Decision :22.05.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Mohit Kapoor, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab. seeking directions to respondents no.1 petitioner as well as his family as they apprehend threat from respondents no.6 to 9 and their other counsel contends that an FIR no.23 dated BNS, 2023 and Section 66(D) of the IT registered at Police Station City Rampura, Bathinda, against the fter investigation, cancellation report dated 03.03.2025 was prepared and filed before the Sub-Divisional Judicial complainant Resham Singh has also got recorded his statement before the Court that he is agreeable to cancellation of has also referred to status report, dated to contend that as of now no threat to the petitioner or his family seeking directions to respondents no.1 petitioner as well as his family as they apprehend threat from respondents no.6 to 9 and their other FIR no.23 dated BNS, 2023 and Section 66(D) of the IT against the fter investigation, cancellation report Judicial got to cancellation of has also referred to status report, dated to contend that as of now no threat to the petitioner or his family PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.23 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4610-2025 3. In view thereof, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before respondent no.3/Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda family members appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. It goes without saying that the petitioner is at liberty to initiate proceedings for malicious prosecution in accordance with law, if so advised May 22, 2025 ps 2025 -2- view thereof, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before respondent no.3/Senior Superintendent of Police, Bathinda, in case he apprehends threat to his or his family members’ life and liberty in future, which appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. It goes without saying that the petitioner is at liberty to initiate proceedings for malicious prosecution in accordance with law, if so advised. May 22, 2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable view thereof, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before respondent no.3/Senior n case he apprehends threat to his or his which will be looked into and an appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. It goes without saying that the petitioner is at liberty to initiate proceedings for malicious prosecution (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No view thereof, the petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move an appropriate application before respondent no.3/Senior n case he apprehends threat to his or his an appropriate action will be taken in accordance with law. It goes without saying that the petitioner is at liberty to initiate proceedings for malicious prosecution TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) PUSHPINDER SAINI 2025.05.23 19:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document