Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54509 (PAT)

Ranjan kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./44274/2025 · 2025-08-06

Chandra Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44274 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Patna ====================================================== Ranjan kumar S/O Anil yadav R/O Village- Sundarpur, Police Station- Katrisarai, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 468/2025 dated 20.02.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 112(2) and 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 66C and 66D of the I.T. Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, on seeing police a person started fleeing away but he was apprehended who disclosed his name as Ranjan Kumar. On search, 13 mobile phones, 10 sim cards, one laptop, 09 ATM cards, 3 Aadhar cards, one keyboard, one mouse, two chargers, one A.C. remote and printer were recovered from the flat of the petitioner. On Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44274 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 query, the petitioner disclosed that Nitesh Yadav used to give ads on facebook for loan from Dhani App. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has one antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above- named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Patna in connection with Patna Cyber P.S. Case No. 468/2025, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44274 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 7. The application stands allowed. atul/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T