APHC010145552024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7623/2024 Between: 1. G VEERABABURAO, S/O G. NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 70 YRS, R/O. D.NO. 4-18-27, FEEDER RAOD, TUNI TOWN, KAKINADA DISTRICT. . ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAYAKARAOPETA POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, A.P. 4. GIDUTURI VENKATA RAMARAO, S/O LATE GIDUTURI JOGINATHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. GIDUTURI YOGESWARA RAO, S/O LATE JOGINADHAM, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. GIDUTURI NARMADA, W/O LATE GIDUTURI NAGENDRA RAO , AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 7. GIDUTURI LAKSHMI NARAYANA, S/O LATE GIDUTURI JOGINADAM, AGED ABOUT 55YRS, R/O D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 8. GIDUTURI VENKATA SAI BALA, S/O LATE GIDUDURI NARAYANA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 55 YRS, R/O DR NO 4-9- 2/A, KILLADAVARI STREET GARUVU VEEDI, TUNI, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 9. GIDUTURI VENKATA SAI, S/O LATE G JOGA RAO AGED ABOUT 51 YRS, R/O D.NO. 4-18-25/1, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2 10. GIDUTHURI SATYA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE G JOGA RAO AGED ABOUT 48 YRS, D.NO. 4-18-25/1 FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 11. GIDUTHURI JAGANNADA RAO, S/O LATE G BULLABBAI AGED ABOUT 54 YRS, D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 12. GIDUTURI SRINIVAS RAO, S/O LATE G BULLABBAI AGED ABOUT 54 YRS, D.NO. 4-18-25, FEEDER ROAD, TUNI TOWN, TUNI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly the respondent No. 3 herein regard to registration of FIR and to take initiate necessary action against the respondents 4 to 12. Inspite of receipt of petitioners written complaint given on 12.09.2023 and the same was endorsed to the respondents 2 and 3 for necessary action as illegal, arbitrary, irrational, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and to consequently direct the 3rdrespondent to register F.I.R against the respondent 4 to 12 herein to take necessary action and to do the investigation in to it expeditiously as early as possible and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: “ ... to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents particularly the respondent No.3 herein regard to registration of FIR and to take initiate necessary action against the respondents 4 to 12. In spite of receipt of petitioners written complaint given on 12.09.2023 and the same was endorsed to the respondents 2 and 3 for necessary action as illegal, arbitrary, irrational, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and to consequently direct the 3rdrespondent to register F.I.R against the respondent 4 to 12 herein to take necessary action and to do the investigation in to it expeditiously as early as possible and to pass ...” Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. Learned Assistant Government Pleader placed on record, the written instructions and would submit that respondent Police did not receive any complaint dated 12.09.2023 from the Petitioner. On enquiry it came to light that there are civil disputes between the Petitioner and unofficial respondents and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Petitioner is at liberty to work out the remedy before appropriate forum according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* Dinesh 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 7623 of 2024 22.11.2025 Mjl /* Dinesh