Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54494 (KAR)

SHIVAKUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/11354/2023 · 2025-09-09

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 11354 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11354 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SHIVAKUMAR S/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS 2. SHIVAMMA W/O NAGARAJU, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 3. NAGARAJU S/O LATE SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS ALL ARE R/AT BANNIKUPPE VILLAGE, KAILANCHA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK-562159 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. B.H.BHAGAVAN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION, RAMANAGARA, REP BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING COMPLEX, Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 11354 of 2023 BENGALURU-560001 2. SRI RAMALINGAIAH S/O LATE PUTTALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/AT BELLIKOTTANURU VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, RAMANAGARA TALUK-562132 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.LAKSHMAN, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.1680/2023 (IS ARISING OUT OF CR.NO.70/2022) OF RAMANAGARA WOMEN POLICE STATION FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 498A, 323,504 R/W SEC.34 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF DP ACT, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT RAMANAGARA. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. 2. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. 3. Vide order dated 17.07.2025, a conditional order was passed by granting two weeks' time to comply with the office objections, failing which necessary orders would be - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35548 CRL.P No. 11354 of 2023 passed for dismissal of the petition. Despite the same, the office objections are not complied with. 4. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default. 5. In view of the disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7