Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54494 (AP)

Nallagatla Saritha v. National Highways Authority of India

WP/41553/2015 · 2025-11-23

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010370762015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE 3459 PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.41553 OF 2015 Between: Nallagatla Saritha and 2 others --- Petitioners and National Highways Authority of India, Rep. by its Chairman, G5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwaraka, New Delhi-110075 and 3 others --- Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri G.V.L. Murthy Counsel for the Respondents : G.P. for Revenue S.S. Varma (SC for NHAI) The Court made the following: JS,J WP No.41553/2015 2 ORDER: The present Writ Petition, under Article 226 of Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioners seeking the following relief: “…..to issue any writ, order or direction more in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the action of the 3rd respondent in making markings in the petitioner’s lands being Ac.1.00 in Sy.No. 54-2-1-B-2, Ac.1.00 in Sy.No.54-2-1-A and Ac.1.00 in Sy.No.54-2-1-B-1, respectively in Uppalapadu Village, Veldurthi Mandal, Guntur District, without notifying the required extent of land from the petitioners’ lands and further action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from their respective extents of land as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 15 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from their respective lands mentioned above and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper …” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioners, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication. JS,J WP No.41553/2015 3 3. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:24.11.2025 DSH