NEW AP TAEKWONDO ASSN., VISAKHAPATNAM. v. UNION OF INDIA, SPORTS,NEW DELHI, & 2 OTRS.
WP/17258/2016 · 2025-10-12
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54485 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54485 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010621502016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 17258/2016 Between:
1. NEW AP TAEKWONDO ASSN., VISAKHAPATNAM, FLAT NO.23, PARVATHI ENCLAVE, RAMNAAAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP.BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY P.ATCHUTA REDDY,
...PETITIONER AND
1. UNION OF INDIA SPORTS NEW DELHI, REP.BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY - SPORTS & YOUTH AFFAIRS, MINISTRY OF SPORTS & YOUTH AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2. THE RETURNING OFFICER TAEKWONDO, FEDERATION OF INDIA, B-29, QUTAB INSTITUTIONAL AREA, NEW DELHI. 3. TAEKWONDO FEDERATION OF INDIA, REP.BY ITS ACTING PRESIDENT RAJ KAKOTI, R.K.AGENCY, S.S.ROAD. SAHIDA MARKET, LAKTHOTIA, GUWAHATI - 781001, ASSAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or: any other appropriate writ, order. direction directing the 2nd respondent to enroll the Petitioner Association as its constituent member and permit the President & Secretary of the Petitioner Association to vote in the election to be conducted before the end of July 2016 for the 3rd respondent
2 JS,J W.P.No.17258/2016
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 21231 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the 2nd respondent to immediately enroll the Petitioner Association as its constituent member and permit the President & Secretary of the Petitioner Association to vote in the election to be conducted before the end of July 2016 for the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T RAJINIKANTH REDDY
2. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA
3 JS,J W.P.No.17258/2016
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri G. Sai Lochan, learned counsel, representing Smt. V. Sesha Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS
4 JS,J W.P.No.17258/2016
107
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 17258/2016
Dated: 13.10.2025 KAS