APHC010213312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] SATURDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10027/2018 Between: 1. DR. SAJEEDA PARVEEN SHAIK,, W/O. FEROZ BASHA, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC. UN EMPLOYEE, R/O. 19-4-17, LANCHESTER ROAD, SANGADIGUNTA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, NEW DELHI - 110 001. 2. SECY THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BAHADURSHA ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI- 110 002. 3. JOINT SECY THE UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, REP. BY ITS JOINT SECRETARY (SCHOLARSHIP AND AWARDS) BAHADURSHA ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI- 110 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not selecting the petitioner for the Fellowship for the Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women PDFWM-2017-2018-AND-44875 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to select the petitioner for the Fellowship for the Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women PDFWM-2017-2018-AND-44875 and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 2 JS, J W.P.No.10027/2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to select the petitioner for the Fellowship for the Post Doctoral Fellowship for Women PDFWM-2017-2018 - AND-44875, pending disposal of the writ potion, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANCHA PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BETHAPALLI SURYANARAYANA (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL) 3 JS, J W.P.No.10027/2018 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Perused the record. Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 22.11.2025 rsd 4 JS, J W.P.No.10027/2018 58 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 10027/2018 Date: 22.11.2025 rsd