Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54465 (AP)

Challagundla Vijayalakshmi v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/7627/2019 · 2025-12-21

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010176842019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 7627/2019 Between: 1. CHALLAGUNDLA VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O CHALLAGUNDLA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 7-47/1, PULLITLA, KOTHAGNESHNIPADU VILLAGE, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, AT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PIDUGURALLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE TAHSILDAR, MACHAVARAM, MACHAVARM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2 8. BANAVATH ANJANEYULU NAIK, S/O B. VENKATRAO NAIK, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC GOVT. EMPLOYEE, R/O D. NO. 9-123, VELPUR VILLAGE, ACHAMPETA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. CHALLAGUNDLA SRINU, S/O LATE MASTAN, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D. NO, MAIN ROAD, KOTHA GANESHUNI PADU VILLAGE, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring action of the 4th Respondent in not to taking any action against the respondent Nos. 8 and 9 and their henchment who are trying to fencing the poles by interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land in Sy No 478 to an extent of Ac 2. 27 1/2 cents situated at Konanki Village, Piuguralla Mandal Guntur District is illegal arbitrary and violative rights of guaranteed by the Constitution of India and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4th respondent to register the crime against the respondent Nos. 8 & 9 and their henchment who are trying to fencing the poles by interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land in Sy No 478 to an extent of Ac 2. 27 1/2 cents situated at Konanki Village, Piuguralla Mandal Guntur District the pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SESHAGIRIRAO YALAMANCHILI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.7627 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournments also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22.12.2025 Pmk 4 04 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:7627 OF 2019 Date: 22.12.2025 Pmk