1 2025:CGHC:20452 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2235 of 2025 1 - Smt. Kavita Dhruw W/o Niranjan Singh Kushram Aged About 40 Years Caste- Gond, R/o Girari Ward No.-4, Kadampara, Girari, Post - Amarpur, Tahsil - Pendra, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Board Of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur (C.G.) 3 - The Upper Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - The Collector District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 5 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Pendraroad, District Gourela- Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 6 - The Tahsildar Pendraroad, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 7 - Upendra Rai S/o Shivshankar Rai R/o Village - Kirari, Post - Amarpur, Tahsil - Pendra, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 8 - Chandranikesh Paikra S/o Gulab Singh R/o Village - Basantpur, Tahsil - Pendraroad, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 9 - Jaypal S/o Kamod Singh R/o Village - Kirari, Post - Amarpur, Tahsil - Pendra, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.05.13 17:59:39 +0530 2 10 - Guddi @ Ramvati D/o Patiram R/o Beljhariya, Tahsil - Marwahi, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) 11 - Sumitra Bai @ Sunita D/o Munna @ Ram Singh R/o Village - Nawagaon, Tahsil - Belgahna, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 12 - Jankunwar @ Dulariya D/o Banshi R/o Pakariya, Tahsil - Pendraroad, District Gourela-Pendra-Marwahi (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State/Respondent/s : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 05/05/2025 1. Heard Mr. Ajeet Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Anuja Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the State/respondent/s on advance copy. 2. By this instant petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief/s : “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting-aside/quashing the impugned order dated 20.02.2025 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 3 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without arraying him as party in proceedings orders have been passed in respect of mutation. Though the petitioner has not been made party, however, the right of the petitioner is being affected as such, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed that the impugned order may be set aside. 4. Leaned counsel for the respondent-State has opposed the argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the petitioner is not having any locus. 5. Considering the fact that the petitioner is not made party in the said proceedings, these orders are not binding upon him, however, if the petitioner wishes to challenge the same and to get an order in his favour on the basis of any sale deed etc., he may approach before the concerned Appellate authority as well as before the concerned Civil Court raising all his grievances. 6. With the aforesaid observation(s) and direction(s), the present petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi