APHC010424162021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25953/2021 Between: 1. SUNKARA LAKSHMI, W/O.KOTESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.2-56, PARUCHURIVARIPALEM, HAMLET OF VULLIPALEM, KODURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. PINNAMANENI INDIRA, W/O.RAVINDRA PRASAD, HINDU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O.DOOR NO.2-32/A, YELAKURRU VILLAGE, PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SUNKAVALLI PRASANTHI, W/O.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA MURTHY, HINDU, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.8-3-317/ 1, MARUTHI NAGAR, YOUSUFGUDA, HYDERABAD. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, KODURU POLICE STATION, KODURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. KODALI ANASUYA, W/O.RAMAMOHANA RAO, HINDU, AGED 57 YEARS, PEDARUVURU VILLAGE, TENALI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAJESH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. K M KRISHNA REDDY 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 in interfering with the property of the Petitioners of an extent of Ac.0-04 cents (194 sq.yds.), Ac.0-03 cents (146 sq.yds) and Ac.0-03 cents (146 sq.yds), respectively in R.S.No.689/2 of Koduru and Mandal, Krishna District, at the instance of the Respondent No.5, despite the Legal Notice dt.29- 10-2021 got issued by the Petitioners to the 4th Respondent and despite the Civil Suit in O.S.No.153 of 2019 pending on the file of Prl. Junior Civil Judge Court at Avanigadda, but still trying to dispossess the Petitioners by the 4th Respondent, is nothing but high handed, unlawful, illegal and in violation of The Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 300-A of the Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondent No.4 not to interfere with the property of the Petitioners of an extent of Ac.0-04 cents (194 sq.yds.), Ac.0-03 cents (146 sq.yds) and Ac.0-03 cents (146 sq.yds), respectively in R.S.No.689/2 of Koduru Village and Mandal, Krishna District, except under due process of law.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioners and Respondent No.5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:15.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25953 of 2021 Dt.15.10.2025 Dinesh