IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (105) COCP-2251-2025 Date of decision:- 21.05.2025 Subhash Chander ...Petitioner Versus Vijayendra Kumar and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL Present:- Mr. Raj Kumar Makkad, Advocate, with Mr. Himalya Makkad, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Satish Singla, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana. … SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (Oral) 1. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondents. 2. State counsel has placed on record a copy of order vide Endst. No. TE/104/54/Establishment-II/8184, dated 07.05.2025 (in vernacular) and submits that the petitioner has been allowed to perform his duty till the age of 60 years. Copy thereof has been supplied to the counsel for the petitioner. 3. Counsel for the petitioner seeks and is granted permission to withdraw the contempt petition. 4. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE 21.05.2025 Pardeep Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PARDEEP NAUTIYAL 2025.05.22 15:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment