Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54454 (AP)

YADALA RAGHAVENDRA RAO v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/42215/2022 · 2025-11-04

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010715172022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42215/2022 Between: 1. YADALA RAGHAVENDRA RAO, S/O SAMBASIVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PALNADU DISTRICT, NARASARAOPET, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET I TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, NARASARAOPET RURAL POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. YADALA MADHAVI, W/O RAGHAVENDRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 6. GADDIKONTI ANJANEYULU, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. TRACTOR DRIVER, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. GADDIKONTI NAGAMMA, W/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. GADDIKONTI KOTESWARA RAO KOTI, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. EMPLOYEE, R/O. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. GADDIKONTI KRISHNA, S/O ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC. AUTO DRIVER, RIO. KESANUPALLI VILLAGE, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, PALNADU DISTRICT, ERSTWHILE GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent police not send my statement to the 4th respondent police, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent Police to send my statement to the 4th respondent police station, which was recorded by the 3rd respondent police, dated 04-12-2022, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent police forthwith send my statement to the 4th respondent police station, which was recorded by the 3rd respondent police, dated 04-12-2022, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G KONDALA RAO 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 42215 of 2022 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent police not send my statement to the 4th respondent police, is as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent Police to send my statement to the 4th respondent police station, which was recorded by the 3rd respondent police, dated 04-12-2022, and pass.…” 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 05.11.2025. UPS 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.42215 of 2022 Dated.05.11.2025 UPS 132