Research › Search › Judgment
Bombay High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 54452 (BOM)
SURESH KASHIRAM MAPARI v. STATE OF MAHA., THR. ITS DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI AND OTHERS
WP/6649/2022 · 2025-07-09
Shri Sachin Shivajirao Deshmukh
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54452 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 54452 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
45. WP 6649 of 2022.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6649/2022 Shri Suresh Kashiram Mapari ...Versus… State of Maharashtra, Through its Divisional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati Tah. and District Amravati and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ -
Mr. O.A. Ghare and Mr. Aditya Gabhane, Advocates for petitioner Mr. S.V. Narale, AGP for respondent No.1 Mr. A.S. Deshpande, Advocate for respondent No.2 Mr. Raju Kadu, Advocate for respondent No.3
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 09/07/2025
1.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the petition is rendered infructuous.
2. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.)
Wadkar 2025:BHC-NAG:6511