Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5445 (RAJ)

APOORVA SHARMA D/O BITTLESH SHARMA v. JAIPUR VIDYUT VITRAN NIGAM LIMITED

CW/1634/2025 · 2025-02-03

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4558] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1634/2025 Apoorva Sharma D/o Bittlesh Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 102, Khatiyon Ka Mohalla, Nangal Jaisa Bohara, Jhotwara, Jaipur At Present Working On The Post Of Junior Engineer, In The Office Of Assistant Engineer (O And M) Jvvnl Manoharpur Under S/o Khora Ladkhani (Khora) Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur Its Managing Director. 2. Secretary (Amn.), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. 3. Assistant Engineer (O And M) Jvvnl, Manoharpur District Jaipur. 4. Pankaj Kumar Singh, At Present Working On The Post Of Junior Engineer, In The Office Of Assistant Engineer (O And M) Jvvnl Bayana Under S/o Rural-I ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravinder Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Singh Shekhawat HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 03/02/2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file a representation. Considering the same, present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner to file a representation within a period of seven days, from the date of this order, before the competent authority. The concerned authority is directed to [2025:RJ-JP:4558] (2 of 2) [CW-1634/2025] consider the said representation within an upper limit of fifteen days thereafter, strictly in accordance with law. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/179