HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case No.: RP No. 83/2024 in WP(C) No. 2123/2022 Lal Chand and others ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant (s) Through :- Ms. Meenakshi Salathia, Adv. v/s Union of India and others .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE ORDER 02.05.2025 CM No. 7476/2024 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay of 195 days in filing the review petition. 2. For reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. delay in filing the review petition is condoned. 3. CM stands disposed of 4. Review petition is taken on board. RP No. 83/2024 1 Through the medium of present petition, the petitioners are seeking review of judgment dated 07.06.2024 passed in WP(C) No. 2123/2022, whereby the writ petition preferred by the petitioners was dismissed and the petitioners were granted liberty to challenge their disengagement order, if they intended to do so. 1 2 RP No. 83/2024 2 We have examined the grounds of the review petition as delineated in paragraph 11(A) to 11(I) and we find that the appeal has been camouflaged as the review because the sole grievance of the petitioners is that this Court has not rightly appreciated the factual as well as legal aspects of the case. 3 If that is the case, the petitioners have a remedy of assailing the judgment by resorting to the remedy as available under law but the petitioners cannot seek review of the judgment dated 07.06.2024, particularly when they have not been able to demonstrate before this Court any error apparent on the face of record, warranting review by this Court. 4 Accordingly, we do not find any merit in the present review petition, as such, the same is dismissed. (MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) (RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE JUDGE JAMMU 02.05.2025 Rakesh Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No Rakesh Kumar 2025.05.03 12:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document