APHC010780672015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 791/2015 Between: 1. SRI K SRIDHAR AND OTHER, S/O. K.S.L. NARASIMHA CHARYULU, HINDU, AGE 54 YEARS, D.NO.42/277, BHAGYA NAGAR COLONY, SHANKARAPURAM, KADAPA - 516002. 2. C. VENKATA SUBBAIAH,, S/O. SUBBARAYUDU, HINDU, AGE 65 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 6/80, BRAHMANA STREET, PORUMAMILLA VILLAGE & MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. SRI N SHANKAR REDDY, S/o. N. Subba Reddy, Aged major, Correspondent, Sri Sai Vidyanikethan, Vidya Nagar, Siddavatam Road, Badvel, Kadapa District - 516227. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersagainst the Judgment dated 14.09.2015 passed in I.A.No. 1569/2015 in O.S.SR. No. 7706/2015 on the file of Principal District Judge, Kadapa. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 1699 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant exparte ad-Interim injunction restraining the respondent/defendant, his men, assignees, agents and persons claiming through him from altering or damaging the structures of the temple including replacing the idol till disposal of the appeal and pass 2 JS,J C.M.A.No.791/2015 Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. P V L BHANU PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent: 1. SUDARSHAN REDDY DUDDUGUNTA 2. SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL 3 JS,J C.M.A.No.791/2015 The Court made the following JUDGMENT: Though the matter was adjourned on 12.03.2025, 19.03.2025, and 30.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 16.10.2025. Even on that day there was no representation for the appellants. Therefore, the matter was listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, Ms. Sravani, learned counsel appeared through online on behalf of the appellant and requested time. Since the learned counsel appearing for the appellants is not ready to argue the matter, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as non- prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 04.12.2025 KAS 4 JS,J C.M.A.No.791/2015 132 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 791/2015 Date: 04.12.2025 KAS