Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54441 (MAD)

Sivaraman v. The State Represented by

CRL OP/13659/2025 · 2025-04-29

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.04.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.No.9074 of 2025 Sivaraman ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu Police Station, Nagapattinam District. Crime No.291 of 2020 2.Krishnan ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Sections 482 of Cr.P.C. and 485 of BNSS praying to call for the connected records made in crime No.291 of 2020 dated 18.06.2020 on the file of Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu Police Station, Nagapattinam District and quash the same as illegal to secure ends of justice. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Ramesh For R1 : Mr.A.Gopinath, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.291 of 2020 on the file of the first respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 2. The case of the prosecution is that during the time of spreading of covid-19, the petitioner along with other persons waylaid the defacto complainant and gave a life threat to him 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Therefore, he sought for quashing the impugned proceedings. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that investigation in the aforesaid case is almost completed and the first respondent is to file final report. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record. 6. I will not fault the first respondent for having registered the impugned First Information Report. But no adverse consequence ensued. It is https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 seen that the Government has taken a policy decision not to pursue the cases registered in the wake of breach of lock down restrictions. In these circumstances, continuance of the impugned prosecution is unwarranted. 5. Therefore, the impugned First Information Report in Crime No.291 of 2020 registered on the file of the first respondent is hereby quashed and the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.04.2025 Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order lok https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. lok To 1.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvenkadu Police Station, Nagapattinam District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.No.13659 of 2025 29.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis