Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 54439 (AP)

Seelam Ravi Babu v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/11307/2019 · 2025-11-30

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010251402019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11307/2019 Between: 1. SEELAM RAVI BABU, S/O LATE.ANKAIAH, AGE 40 YEARS DNO.8-21-19/1, 3RD LANE, SITARAM NAGAR, GUNTLTR-1. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR RURAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THULLURU,THULLURU MANDAL. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PEDAKURAPADU,PEDKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PEDAKURAPADU POLICE STATION, PEDKURAPADU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2 to 5th respondents in not registering the complaint dated 29.7.2019 as FIR is illegal, improper, arbitrary,unjust and against the principles of natural justice, violation of Art 14 of constitutional India and consequently direct the 2 to 5th respondents to register the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 29.7.2019 as FIR forthwith, and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2 to 5th respondents to register the complaint submitted by the petitioner dated 29.7.2019 as FIR forthwith,pending the disposal of the writ petition, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MARELLA RADHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.11307 OF 2019 ORDER: Sri Nandipalle Venkatesh, learned counsel representing Smt. Marella Radha, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 1st December, 2025 cbn 4 27 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 11307 OF 2019 1st December, 2025 cbn